sinnohqueen:

ORAS is literally going to be the greatest game in existence because look at this. team magma is so nice and organized and serious right

image

and then there’s TEAM AQUA

image

image

image

i love pokemon. i love pokemon so much iw ill marry gamefrea K

I think I would much rather join Aqua, thank you very much.

foodffs:

Creamy Broccoli Chicken Shells and Cheese

Really nice recipes. Every hour.

I know what I’m making for dinner.

foodffs:

CRUNCHY BAKED PARMESAN CHICKEN BITES

Really nice recipes. Every hour.

How can I possibly not reblog this.

starexorcist:

shittygifsanon:

Thanks Videogames

I”M GONNA CRY THEY USED MY LIANA DRAWINGS THIS IS AMAZING BLESS

foodffs:

WHOLE LEMON BARS

Really nice recipes. Every hour.

foodffs:

SNOWSKIN MOONCAKES

Really nice recipes. Every hour.

Anonymous sent:
do you know what love is?

shittywebcomics:

thetenk:

no.

image

HK-47: the love machine.

fnook:

techiecreek:

Premium Bandai Beelzebumon Jacket

Holy crap, that’s pretty slick.

I only just found out about this, but I need this NOW.

staxilicious:

linzthenerd:

theguilteaparty:

crippledcuriosity:

itsfondue:

Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

I was a biblical scholar and the thing that always sticks in my craw about people like the original statement maker is that the first thing Christ says is that the rules that his followers should be paying attention to and following are the ones that he personally gives them. He goes on to say that he wants everyone to treat everyone else with love and generosity and kindness. 

the reason the right wing christians like to wave the bible around and quote from the old testament is that the new testament DOES NOT SUPPORT THEIR BULLSHIT. 

Layin’ the smackdown on dem evangelical/born-again heretics.

(Source: idiotsonfb)

shittywebcomics:

herokick:

Ryuko does not wear a regular Stadium jacket. What she is wearing is a Sukajan (スカジャン) Jacket.

These are often made of shiny material with intricate embroidery on the front and back. In Sushio’s early sketch for Ryuko, she was supposed to have a dragon embroidered on the back of her jacket, which is a popular design for Sukajan. The Ryuko Cospa Jacket which was worn by Sushio and Ami Koshimizu is also made a similar shiny material as a Sukajan jacket.

Sukajan jackets were once worn by juvenile delinquents, yakuza, and rebellious youth. That association still exists today but to a lesser degree than in the past.

welp, I guess I need to post this here.

Glad to know the kind of jackets I normally wear would label me a delinquent in Japan.

kurozu501:

This would be so romantic if it wasn’t for the fact that this is literally pedophilia.

plays

SJWs btfo by their own insipid logic. Remember kids, nothing is sexual unless you yourself make it out to be, which in fact, makes you the pervert.